Construction Finance for Commercial Real Estate Projects in the USA | FG Capital Advisors

Notice. This page is informational and general in nature. Any mandate remains subject to lender underwriting, KYC and AML checks, appraisal, legal review, and third-party approvals. All rates, leverage levels, and market data are indicative and subject to change.

Construction Finance for Commercial Real Estate Projects in the USA

Commercial real estate development in the United States has never been more geographically concentrated. The same population migration patterns, business relocation trends, and housing supply deficits that are reshaping the Sun Belt are creating sustained, multi-year construction finance demand in a handful of states that are growing faster than their existing building stock can accommodate.

FG Capital Advisors arranges construction finance for CRE development projects across the United States — ground-up construction loans, construction-to-permanent facilities, mezzanine debt, and preferred equity — for developers in high-growth markets who need a lender with real appetite for their asset type, location, and project profile.

Get Started

The US CRE Construction Finance Market in 2026

The commercial real estate construction finance market is bifurcated. Gateway markets — New York, San Francisco, Chicago, Los Angeles — are experiencing tighter credit conditions, elevated construction costs, and softening demand in certain asset classes, particularly office. High-growth Sun Belt and Southeast markets are running in the opposite direction: population growth, job creation, and an acute shortage of multifamily, industrial, and mixed-use supply are sustaining construction activity and lender appetite even as rates remain elevated.

$500B+
Annual commercial construction put in place in the USA, consistently among the highest levels on record
60–75%
Typical senior loan-to-cost range for institutional construction lenders on qualified CRE projects
18–36
Typical construction loan term in months, with extension options for projects with delayed stabilisation
8–10
Top Sun Belt and Southeast states currently accounting for a disproportionate share of new CRE construction starts

US States With the Highest CRE Construction Finance Demand

Construction finance demand follows population, employment, and supply deficits. The states below are not simply large — they are markets where the gap between housing and commercial space supply and demand is widest, creating the most sustained and lender-supported development pipeline.

Texas Tier 1

The single most active CRE construction finance market in the country by volume. Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, Austin, and San Antonio are all running large development pipelines simultaneously across multifamily, industrial, mixed-use, and life sciences. Population growth from California and Northeast migration continues to outpace supply. The Texas development environment — no state income tax, streamlined permitting in most major metros, and a deep local banking and non-bank lender base — makes it the most financeable large-scale development market in the US.

  • Most active asset classes: multifamily, industrial and logistics, mixed-use, life sciences in Houston.
  • Key sub-markets: DFW Metroplex, Greater Houston, Austin metro, San Antonio medical district.
  • Lender appetite: strong across banks, debt funds, and insurance company lenders for qualified sponsors.
Florida Tier 1

Florida has absorbed one of the largest domestic migration surges in modern US history, with Miami, Tampa, Orlando, and Jacksonville all posting sustained population growth that has created acute housing and commercial space shortages. South Florida in particular has attracted significant institutional capital and corporate relocations, driving demand for Class A office, multifamily, mixed-use retail, and hospitality development. The state's coastal markets also sustain strong short-term rental and hotel construction activity.

  • Most active asset classes: luxury and workforce multifamily, hospitality, mixed-use, industrial in Central Florida.
  • Key sub-markets: Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, Tampa Bay, Orlando metro, Jacksonville.
  • Lender appetite: competitive; insurance lenders and debt funds highly active alongside regional banks.
Georgia Tier 1

Atlanta has emerged as the dominant corporate relocation destination in the Southeast, with major tech, financial services, and logistics companies establishing or expanding regional headquarters. The broader Georgia industrial corridor, anchored by the Port of Savannah, is one of the most active industrial and logistics development markets in the country. Multifamily development across the Atlanta suburbs continues at pace driven by consistent employment and population growth.

  • Most active asset classes: industrial and logistics, multifamily, corporate campus, data centre.
  • Key sub-markets: Atlanta metro, Savannah logistics corridor, Columbus, Augusta.
  • Lender appetite: strong; Atlanta has a deep local and regional lender base with national debt fund coverage.
Arizona Tier 1

Phoenix is running one of the most active CRE construction pipelines of any US metro, driven by semiconductor and advanced manufacturing investment (TSMC, Intel), data centre development, and sustained residential and multifamily demand from California migration. Tucson has a smaller but growing development market anchored by the University of Arizona and adjacent life sciences activity. Arizona's low-cost construction environment and streamlined regulatory framework make it one of the most developer-friendly states in the country.

  • Most active asset classes: industrial, data centre, multifamily, semiconductor-adjacent commercial.
  • Key sub-markets: Greater Phoenix, East Valley, Scottsdale, Tucson.
  • Lender appetite: very strong; significant non-bank lender interest in semiconductor and data centre adjacent development.
North Carolina Tier 2

The Research Triangle (Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill) and Charlotte are two of the fastest-growing metros in the Southeast, both attracting significant corporate investment in technology, financial services, and life sciences. Charlotte's financial sector concentration drives Class A office and mixed-use demand. The Triangle's university ecosystem sustains life sciences and innovation campus development. Both metros have significant multifamily supply deficits relative to population growth.

  • Most active asset classes: life sciences, multifamily, mixed-use, Class A office in Charlotte.
  • Key sub-markets: Raleigh-Durham metro, Charlotte-Mecklenburg, Asheville hospitality.
  • Lender appetite: growing national lender interest; regional banks remain primary construction lenders.
Tennessee Tier 2

Nashville has been one of the most consistently overperforming CRE markets in the country for the past decade, with healthcare, music and entertainment, and corporate relocation driving diversified demand. Memphis anchors a significant industrial and logistics development corridor tied to FedEx operations and Amazon distribution. Tennessee's zero income tax environment continues to attract high-net-worth migration and corporate headquarters relocations that sustain luxury residential and Class A commercial development.

  • Most active asset classes: multifamily, hospitality, mixed-use in Nashville; industrial in Memphis.
  • Key sub-markets: Nashville-Davidson, Memphis logistics corridor, Knoxville, Chattanooga.
  • Lender appetite: solid regional bank and debt fund coverage for qualified Nashville sponsors.
Nevada Tier 2

Las Vegas has diversified its development market well beyond hospitality, with significant industrial, logistics, and data centre activity alongside sustained multifamily demand. The Northern Nevada market around Reno and Sparks has become a major industrial and advanced manufacturing hub, driven by Tesla's Gigafactory and subsequent supplier ecosystem. Nevada's zero income tax environment and proximity to California continue to attract population and business relocation that sustains residential and commercial development activity.

  • Most active asset classes: industrial, data centre, multifamily, logistics in Northern Nevada.
  • Key sub-markets: Las Vegas Valley, Reno-Sparks industrial corridor, Henderson.
  • Lender appetite: strong for industrial and logistics; more selective for hospitality and retail.
South Carolina Tier 2

South Carolina has emerged as one of the most active manufacturing and logistics development markets in the Southeast, anchored by the Port of Charleston and a growing automotive and aerospace manufacturing base (BMW, Boeing, Volvo). Charleston's residential and hospitality market sustains consistent mixed-use and hotel development. The Greenville-Spartanburg corridor is one of the most active inland industrial development markets in the region.

  • Most active asset classes: industrial, logistics, automotive-adjacent manufacturing, multifamily in Charleston.
  • Key sub-markets: Charleston metro, Greenville-Spartanburg, Columbia.
  • Lender appetite: regional banks dominant; growing non-bank presence for larger industrial projects.

Asset Types and Current Lender Appetite

Multifamily and Build-to-Rent

The most liquid construction finance asset class in high-growth states. Lenders understand multifamily risk well and the supply deficit in Sun Belt markets underpins demand assumptions. Build-to-rent single-family communities are attracting increasing institutional lender interest in Texas, Florida, and Arizona.

Industrial and Logistics

The strongest lender appetite of any asset class in 2025 and 2026. E-commerce, nearshoring, and supply chain reconfiguration are driving sustained industrial construction demand across every high-growth state. Pre-leased or build-to-suit industrial commands the best construction loan terms available in the market.

Mixed-Use and Retail

Grocery-anchored and necessity-based retail centres in supply-constrained suburban markets are financeable. Speculative Class B retail is not. Mixed-use projects with residential above ground-floor retail are well-received by lenders in the right urban infill locations, particularly in Florida and Georgia.

Hospitality

Select-service and extended-stay hotel construction in primary and secondary Sun Belt markets retains lender support, particularly for branded product in high-RevPAR corridors. Full-service luxury hotel construction requires a demonstrated demand case and experienced hospitality sponsors. Florida and Tennessee are the most active hospitality construction markets.

Life Sciences and Medical Office

Strong lender appetite in established life sciences clusters: Houston's Texas Medical Center, Research Triangle in North Carolina, Phoenix Bioscience Core. Medical office with creditworthy health system tenants pre-leased before construction is among the most financeable CRE product available in current conditions.

Data Centres

One of the fastest-growing construction finance categories nationally. Northern Virginia remains the largest data centre market, but Texas, Arizona, Georgia, and Nevada are all absorbing significant hyperscale and colocation construction. Lender appetite is strong for pre-leased or owner-occupied data centre development with creditworthy tenants.

The Construction Finance Capital Stack

Most CRE construction projects are financed through a layered capital structure. Understanding how each layer works and what it costs is essential to assembling a financeable deal.

Typical Stack
Senior Construction Loan 60–75% LTC · SOFR + 2.5–4.5%
Mezzanine Debt Up to 85–90% LTC · 10–14% all-in
Preferred Equity Fills gap to ~90% of cost · 12–16%
Developer Equity 10–25% of total project cost
What Each Layer Does

Senior construction loan covers the majority of hard and soft costs. Interest-only during construction, drawn in tranches against milestone inspections. Repaid at stabilisation through refinancing or sale.

Mezzanine debt reduces the equity contribution by sitting between the senior loan and developer equity. Secured by a pledge of membership interests in the project LLC rather than a mortgage. Higher cost than senior debt but cheaper than equity.

Preferred equity functions similarly to mezzanine but is structured as an equity investment with a preferred return and liquidation preference rather than as debt. Used where mezzanine is unavailable or where the developer's operating agreement does not permit additional debt encumbrance.

Developer equity is the first-loss position. Most senior lenders require a minimum 25 to 30 percent equity contribution from the sponsor for ground-up construction. Projects with strong pre-leasing or a developer track record may qualify for higher leverage and lower equity requirements.

What Construction Lenders Assess

Underwriting Factor What the Lender Is Assessing What Strengthens Your Application
Sponsor track record Has the developer completed similar projects of comparable size, asset type, and complexity? In the same market? A documented history of on-time, on-budget completions. Named comparable projects with cost and completion data.
Project budget and contingency Is the budget realistic for current construction costs in the market? Is there adequate contingency (typically 5 to 10 percent of hard costs)? Third-party cost review from a recognised quantity surveyor or construction cost consultant. Detailed GC contract with fixed-price or GMP provisions.
General contractor quality Is the GC licensed, bonded, and insured? Do they have a track record with this asset type and size? A signed contract with a creditworthy, experienced GC. Performance and payment bonds covering the full contract value.
Pre-leasing or pre-sales Is there committed demand for the completed space, or is the project fully speculative? Executed LOIs or leases covering a meaningful portion of the net rentable area. For for-sale product, pre-sales deposits from creditworthy buyers.
Market demand fundamentals Does the submarket support the projected rents, occupancy, and absorption timeline? A third-party market study from a recognised CRE research firm covering comparable rents, vacancy rates, and absorption velocity.
Loan-to-cost and LTV at stabilisation Does the senior loan stay within the lender's LTC limit? Will the stabilised value support a conventional permanent loan at maturity? A realistic stabilised valuation with conservative cap rate assumptions. Demonstrated exit path via refinance or sale at maturity.
Equity contribution and liquidity Is the developer's equity fully committed and liquid? Does the developer have sufficient liquidity reserves to cover cost overruns? Equity funded at close or escrowed. Demonstrated personal or institutional liquidity beyond the equity contribution.
Entitlements and permits Has the project cleared zoning, planning, and permitting? Is there any entitlement risk remaining? Full entitlement and building permit in hand at loan close. Lenders rarely fund pre-entitlement construction risk.

Types of Construction Lenders and When to Use Each

Lender Type Typical Loan Size Strengths Limitations
National and super-regional banks $20M–$500M+ Lowest pricing for qualified sponsors. Relationship lending for repeat developers. Construction-to-permanent products available. Stringent credit criteria. Slow approval process. Limited appetite for first-time developers or non-stabilised markets. Concentration limits by geography and asset type.
Regional and community banks $2M–$50M Strong local market knowledge. More flexible underwriting for local developers. Faster approval than nationals. Relationship-driven. Limited to local or regional markets. Lower leverage limits. Balance sheet constraints cap loan size. May require significant deposit relationship.
Debt funds and private credit $5M–$300M+ Flexible underwriting for first-time or emerging developers. Higher leverage available. Faster close than banks. Will consider non-standard assets and markets. Higher pricing than banks, typically SOFR plus 4 to 6 percent. Origination fees of 1 to 2 percent. No deposit requirement but also no long-term relationship.
Insurance company lenders $20M–$200M+ Competitive pricing for stabilised construction-to-permanent. Long-term hold appetite. Preferred for multifamily and industrial in primary markets. Very conservative underwriting. Primarily focused on lower-risk asset classes in primary markets. Limited appetite for ground-up speculative construction.
Bridge and hard money lenders $1M–$30M Fastest close in the market. Minimal documentation requirements. Will lend on distressed situations and complex title. Last resort for time-sensitive transactions. Highest pricing in the market. Short terms. Aggressive default remedies. Not appropriate for institutional-quality projects.

How We Arrange Construction Finance: From Intake to Close

  1. Project Intake and Preliminary Review We review the project summary, location, asset type, total cost, proposed capital structure, sponsor track record, and entitlement status. We provide an initial assessment of financeable leverage, likely lender universe, and indicative pricing within one week.
  2. Capital Structure Recommendation We recommend the optimal capital stack for the project: senior loan sizing, whether mezzanine or preferred equity is needed to reach the developer's required leverage, and the lender type most likely to approve the specific project profile.
  3. Lender Submission Pack Preparation We prepare the lender submission package to the standard required for credit approval: executive summary, project budget, market study summary, sponsor track record, proposed capital structure, and projected stabilised financials with sensitivity analysis.
  4. Lender Identification and Outreach We identify lenders with confirmed appetite for the specific asset type, market, loan size, and sponsor profile, and conduct a targeted outreach process to generate competing term sheets.
  5. Term Sheet Negotiation We support the negotiation of term sheet economics and structural terms, including interest rate, LTC, draw schedule, completion guaranty requirements, recourse provisions, and extension options.
  6. Due Diligence Coordination We coordinate the lender's due diligence process, including appraisal, environmental assessment, construction cost review, and legal documentation, to keep the transaction on schedule through to close.
  7. Close and Draw Management We support through financial close and, where required, assist with the draw request process to ensure the construction loan disbursements align with project milestones and lender inspection requirements.

What To Submit for a Financing Review

  • Project location, asset type, and current entitlement status.
  • Total project cost breakdown including land, hard costs, soft costs, financing costs, and contingency.
  • Proposed capital structure and target leverage level.
  • Sponsor track record: list of comparable completed projects with cost, timeline, and exit data.
  • Current pre-leasing or pre-sales status and any executed LOIs or leases.
  • GC identity and contract status.
  • Projected stabilised income and valuation with cap rate assumptions.
  • Target close date and any hard deadlines on land acquisition or entitlement expiry.
  • KYC documentation for the development entity and all beneficial owners.
Foreign National Developers

We arrange construction finance for international developers and foreign nationals with US development projects. Non-US sponsors typically require a higher equity contribution (35 to 40 percent) and additional KYC documentation, and are best served by non-bank lenders and debt funds rather than US commercial banks. Submit your project details and we will assess the financing options available for your specific sponsor structure.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • A commercial construction loan is a short-term, interest-only facility that funds the hard and soft costs of building a commercial property from ground up. Unlike a permanent mortgage, it is drawn in tranches as construction milestones are reached. The loan typically matures at or shortly after construction completion, at which point the developer refinances into permanent debt, sells the asset, or converts to a permanent facility if the lender offers a construction-to-permanent product.
  • Most senior construction lenders advance between 60 and 75 percent of total project costs, though this varies by asset type, market, sponsor track record, and current credit conditions. Lenders also assess loan-to-value on the completed project, typically requiring the senior loan to represent no more than 65 to 70 percent of the stabilised asset value. The gap between the lender's maximum advance and total project cost must be covered by equity and, in some structures, mezzanine debt.
  • A construction-to-permanent loan is a single facility covering both the construction period and the initial stabilisation period after completion. Rather than requiring the developer to refinance at construction completion, the loan automatically converts to a permanent facility once the project reaches a pre-agreed stabilisation threshold. C-to-P loans reduce execution risk by locking in permanent financing terms at the construction stage.
  • Construction lenders assess the sponsor's track record in completing similar projects, the quality of the project budget and contingency reserves, the general contractor and construction contract, the pre-leasing or pre-sales status, market demand fundamentals, loan-to-cost and projected loan-to-value at stabilisation, and the developer's equity contribution and liquidity. Lenders are assessing both the project and the developer's ability to deliver it on time and on budget.
  • Mezzanine debt in a construction stack sits between the senior construction loan and the developer's equity. It allows a developer to reduce the equity contribution required to close while the senior lender retains its first-priority security position. Mezzanine is secured by a pledge of equity interests in the project entity and carries a higher interest rate than senior debt — typically 10 to 14 percent in current US market conditions — reflecting the subordinated risk position.
  • The states with the most active CRE construction finance markets include Texas, Florida, Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Nevada, and South Carolina. These markets share common drivers: strong population growth, undersupply of housing and commercial space, business-friendly regulatory environments, and sustained lender appetite across multiple asset classes. Industrial and logistics is active across all of these states; multifamily and mixed-use are concentrated in the major metro areas.
  • Yes, though the process is more complex than for US-based sponsors. Foreign national developers typically need to demonstrate a track record of completed projects, establish a US-based entity, provide higher equity (35 to 40 percent versus 25 to 30 percent for US developers), and navigate additional KYC requirements. Non-bank lenders and private credit funds are generally more accessible to foreign national developers than US commercial banks.

If you have a commercial real estate development project in a high-growth US market and need construction finance, submit your project details for a preliminary review. We assess the financeable structure, identify the right lender universe, and manage the process through to close.

Get Started

Disclosure. FG Capital Advisors is not a bank, licensed lender, or direct provider of construction finance. Services are delivered on a best-efforts advisory basis through third-party capital providers and remain subject to lender underwriting, appraisal, KYC and AML checks, legal review, and definitive documentation. All rates, leverage levels, and market data referenced are indicative and subject to change. Nothing on this page constitutes legal, financial, or investment advice.