Notice. This checklist is informational and general in nature. Every transaction remains subject to counterparty acceptability, KYC and AML, sanctions screening, technical and legal diligence, definitive documentation, insurance requirements, and third-party approvals. Obtain independent legal advice.
Closing Checklist for Project Finance Transactions
Project finance closings do not fail because lenders hate the sector. They fail because the file is not close-ready: contracts are not bankable, the model and covenants fight each other, security is not perfected, accounts are not controlled, insurance is not aligned, and conditions precedent sit unresolved until the last week.
This page is a lender-grade closing checklist you can run before you target financial close. If you want us to structure the debt, stress test the model, and manage the closing workflow through approved partners, request a quote.
Request a QuoteUse This Checklist the Right Way
- Run it at mandate start. The point is to surface fatal issues early, not to produce a pretty closing binder late.
- Assign owners. Each line item must have a named owner, a dependency, and a date.
- Prove bankability. Lenders fund what they can underwrite and control under enforceable documents.
Related service pages: Project Finance Debt Structuring , Project Finance Financial Modelling , and Project Finance Equity Bridge and Mezzanine Solutions.
Pre-Close Readiness Snapshot
Before you book a closing date, confirm four things: (1) the revenue and delivery contracts are executable, (2) permits and land rights are clean, (3) the model reconciles to the contracts and covenants, and (4) the control stack is enforceable on day one.
| Readiness Area | Pass Criteria | Common Failure Mode |
|---|---|---|
| Contracting | Offtake or revenue framework, EPC, O&M, and key permits match the model and lender requirements | Soft offtake, weak termination regime, liquidated damages misfit, unallocated risks |
| Permits and land | Land rights secured, permits in force, grid and interconnection path is documented | Conditional permits, unclear land title, late grid works, local authority friction |
| Model and covenants | Model audit complete, DSCR and lock-up logic is consistent, sensitivities are defensible | Model errors, circularity, wrong debt sculpt, covenant definitions not reflected in formulas |
| Security and accounts | Security package signed and perfected, controlled accounts and waterfall are live | Unperfected pledges, missing notices, accounts not opened, waterfall not operational |
| Insurance | Coverage, endorsements, and loss payee mechanics align to lender requirements | Gaps in construction all-risks, DSU, liability, or lender endorsements |
| Compliance | KYC and AML complete, sanctions cleared, beneficial ownership and source of funds clean | UBO gaps, weak governance documents, late screening hits, offshore opacity |
If your project has sustainability-linked reporting expectations or transition finance features, align early with Sustainable Finance Structuring and Placement.
Closing Checklist by Workstream
Use the checklist below as your closing agenda. The goal is simple: eliminate ambiguity and make first draw routine.
| Workstream | Closing Items | Owner | Target Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1) Corporate, Governance, Authority |
|
Sponsor | T-15 days |
| 2) Project Contracts |
|
Legal | T-10 days |
| 3) Permits, Land, and Technical |
|
Tech | T-10 days |
| 4) Financial Model and Underwriting |
|
Model | T-7 days |
| 5) Debt Documents and CP Tracker |
|
Counsel | T-5 days |
| 6) Security Package and Perfection |
|
Counsel | Close date |
| 7) Accounts, Controls, and Cash Waterfall |
|
Ops | T-3 days |
| 8) Insurance and Claims Mechanics |
|
Broker | T-3 days |
| 9) Compliance and Onboarding |
|
Borrower | T-10 days |
First Draw Checklist
Financial close is not the end. First draw is where operational reality shows up. These are the items that stop funding on day one.
- Draw request pack agreed and complete, including invoices, certificates, and required evidence.
- Funds flow signed off with account details validated and payment cutoffs understood.
- Accounts tested for incoming and outgoing paths under the waterfall.
- CP holdbacks clearly defined with cure dates and consequences.
- Reporting started in the first month, not the third month.
- Hedging in place if required by the term sheet, including ISDA and collateral support arrangements.
Common Closing Failures
- Contracts are not lender-proof. Termination, step-in, and LD regimes are weak or inconsistent with the model.
- Permits are conditional. A project is not “permitted” if conditions cannot be met on schedule.
- Model and documents disagree. Covenant and waterfall logic differs between legal docs and Excel.
- Security is not perfected. Signed security is not enough if perfection steps are incomplete.
- Accounts are not controlled. If cash control is loose, lenders slow down or re-trade.
About FG Capital Advisors
FG Capital Advisors provides project finance debt structuring, modelling, and placement coordination through suitable third-party providers, subject to regulatory requirements and approvals. We run closings like a lender would: contract bankability, enforceable security, operational controls, and a CP tracker that is evidence-based.
Explore: Project Finance Debt Structuring and Project Finance Financial Modelling.
FAQ
What is the single most important workstream for project finance closing?
Contract bankability and cash control. If revenue and delivery risk are not allocated under enforceable contracts, the credit committee will not sign off. If cash is not controlled under a waterfall, lenders will not fund reliably.
Do we need a model audit?
If the financing is institutional, expect either a formal model audit or a structured review. It is the fastest way to reduce late-cycle surprises and term sheet re-trades.
What documents do lenders usually treat as critical?
Revenue framework, EPC and O&M, land and permits, debt documents, security and perfection evidence, controlled accounts, insurance endorsements, and the base case model that matches all of the above.
Can equity bridge or mezzanine sit alongside senior debt?
Yes, where the security and intercreditor terms are workable and the project cash flows can support the blended capital stack. See Project Finance Equity Bridge and Mezzanine Solutions.
Do you guarantee a close, pricing, or lender approval?
No. Work is best-efforts and always subject to diligence, compliance screening, definitive documentation, and third-party approvals.
If you want a disciplined path to financial close, submit your contracts, permits status, and model summary. We will revert with a scoped closing plan and the workstreams required to reach first draw.
Request a QuoteDisclosure. This content is for informational purposes and does not constitute legal, tax, accounting, or financial advice. FG Capital Advisors is not a bank or lender and does not accept client money. Any support is provided on a best-efforts basis and remains subject to third-party approvals, diligence, compliance checks, and definitive documentation. No funding, pricing, or timeline is guaranteed.

