Covered Call ETFs vs Real Estate, Equities & Precious Metals
Comparing Income, Growth and Diversification Across Asset Classes
Covered call ETFs, direct real estate, individual equities, the S&P 500 index and precious metals like gold and silver each serve distinct institutional roles. This comparison highlights their typical yield or return, liquidity, volatility, income profile and primary use case—so you can match capital to mandate objectives.
| Asset Class | Typical Return/Yield | Liquidity | Volatility | Income vs Growth | Primary Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covered Call ETFs | 6–15% (option premiums) |
High (ETF shares) | Moderate | High income, capped upside | Yield layering in income portfolios |
| Direct Real Estate | 7–15% (rents + appreciation) |
Low (illiquid) | Low–Moderate | Income + capital growth | Stable cash flow, inflation hedge |
| Individual Stocks | Varies widely (0–50%+) |
High | High | Growth with potential dividends | Thematic and sector exposure |
| S&P 500 Index | 8–10% p.a. (total return) |
Very high | Moderate | Low income (1.5–2% yield) | Core diversified equity |
| Gold & Silver | Varies (0–20%+) |
High (ETFs/physical) | Moderate–High | No income, capital only | Inflation & tail-risk hedge |
No single asset class fits every mandate. Covered call ETFs excel where monthly income and liquidity matter. Real estate delivers both yield and appreciation over the long haul. Equities and the S&P 500 drive growth but carry volatility. Gold and silver offer portfolio ballast in stress scenarios. Allocate according to your income, growth and diversification goals.
For institutional allocation advice or a bespoke comparison of these strategies, connect with FG Capital Advisors. Minimum engagement: $1,000,000.
This content is for accredited investors under U.S. SEC Regulation D. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. All strategies involve market, liquidity, and tax risks. Consult a licensed professional before investing.
